- Torture, Physical Coercion and Reprisals in Bahrain Belie Commitment to Reform
- SEE THEIR STRUGGLE, REALISE THEIR RIGHTS - Human Rights Defenders at Imminent Risk in the Gulf Region and Neighbouring Countries
- Bahrain Joint Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review 27th Session of the UPR Working Group
- KUWAIT: SARAH AL-DREES TRIAL OBSERVATION REPORT
- TRIAL OBSERVATION REPORT Concerning the prosecution of journalists from “Azamn” newspaper in Oman
News from International Organizations
- BAHRAIN: Appeal to release Nabeel Rajab and Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja and concern over their deteriorating health
- Civic space threatened in 106 countries - CIVICUS Monitor
- WHRDIC and Amnesty International Statement at CSW61 2017
- Groups urge Boris Johnson to call for release of Nabeel Rajab
- Bahrain: Urgent Appeal for the Release of Human Rights Defender Nabeel Rajab
Written by HRDs and Journalists
UAE: Dr. Nasser Bin Ghaith appears in court on baseless charges and reports torture in detention
On 4 April 2016, eight months after he was forcibly disappeared in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Dr. Nasser Bin Ghaith was brought before the State Security Chamber of the Federal Supreme Court in Abu Dhabi on trumped up charges.
Dr. Bin Ghaith is a Professor of Economics and human rights defender. He was forcibly disappeared in August 2015 during a raid on his home and held in an undisclosed location until the hearing. For further information, see Gulf Centre for Human Rights (GCHR) appeal dated 25 November 2015 (http://www.gc4hr.org/news/view/1130). He was also one of a group of men collectively known as the UAE5 who were arrested and detained in 2011.
At the hearing on 4 April he outlined to the court how he had been held in a secret location, physically tortured and beaten while in detention and deprived of sleep for up to a week. The judge reportedly reacted to his comments by turning off Dr. Bin Ghaith’s microphone so he could not be heard.
In clear breach of international legal standards the hearing took place behind closed doors, with only his family and state media permitted entry. Despite asking for access to a lawyer he was only allowed to see his lawyer for the first time in the courtroom and was denied any private consultation with him.
The charges against him were based on comments he made on Twitter about the Egyptian government and meetings with peaceful political activists, as well as anti-terrorism charges pertaining to meetings he had with UAE exiles in Turkey. The State Security Chamber has no right of appeal to a higher court, precluding Dr. Bin Ghaith from appealing the verdict, in clear breach of his right to a fair trial. The next hearing is scheduled for 2 May 2016.
The GCHR believes that his arrest and detention are a direct result of the exercise of his right to freedom of expression and his human rights activities. It believes that this is part of an on-going trend by State authorities to punish, deter and hinder the work of those promoting human rights in the UAE.
The GCHR urges the authorities in the UAE to:
- Immediately and unconditionally release Dr. Nasser Bin Ghaith as his arrest is solely related to his peaceful on-line activities;
- Guarantee his physical and psychological integrity and security while he remains in detention;
- Ensure that he is immediately granted access to a lawyer and to his family;
- Ensure that a thorough and impartial investigation is opened into the allegations of torture and ill-treatment and that those responsible are brought to justice;
- Guarantee in all circumstances that all human rights defenders in the UAE are able to carry out their legitimate human rights activities without fear of reprisals and free of all restrictions including judicial harassment.
The GCHR respectfully reminds you that the United Nations Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, adopted by consensus by the UN General Assembly on 9 December 1998, recognises the legitimacy of the activities of human rights defenders, their right to freedom of association and to carry out their activities without fear of reprisals. We would particularly draw your attention to Article 6 (b and c): “Everyone has the right, individually and in association with others: (b) As provided for in human rights and other applicable international instruments, freely to publish, impart or disseminate to others views, information and knowledge on all human rights and fundamental freedoms; (c) To study, discuss, form and hold opinions on the observance, both in law and in practice, of all human rights and fundamental freedoms and, through these and other appropriate means, to draw public attention to those matters”, and to Article 12 (1 and 2): “(1) Everyone has the right, individually and in association with others, to participate in peaceful activities against violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms. (2) The State shall take all necessary measures to ensure the protection by the competent authorities of everyone, individually and in association with others, against any violence, threats, retaliation, de facto or de jure adverse discrimination, pressure or any other arbitrary action as a consequence of his or her legitimate exercise of the rights referred to in the present Declaration.”